Explore Sarajevo A local's guide to the city. 0 PDFs Search

Explore Sarajevo / Stories

Heritage · ·6 min read

Sarajevo 1912 — the Bosnian Parliament the Habsburgs planned across the river from Vijećnica, and the First World War stopped

Sixteen architects sent designs. Second prize went to Rudolf Tönnies. A design was awarded to Anton Floderer in Vienna under the motto 'Am Balkan.' Vancaš drew the final version in 1914. Then Franz Ferdinand was shot two blocks away, and the building never got built.

By Nedim Hadzimahmutovic · Sarajevo

If you walk east along the Miljacka embankment from the Latin Bridge, past the corner where Gavrilo Princip fired the shots that started the First World War on 28 June 1914, you’ll come, in about three minutes, to a spot on the south bank of the river directly opposite Vijećnica. On your side of the water: a small park, a bit of paving, a bench or two. On the other side: the striped Habsburg-Moorish city hall, everybody’s photograph.

Look at your side. Now imagine, opposite the Vijećnica, another Habsburg-era monumental civic building. Big. Symmetrical. Facing the city hall across the river like a diplomatic reply. That’s what was supposed to be here.

The building was the Sabor — the Bosnian Parliament. The Habsburg administration ran a big architectural competition for it in 1912. Sixteen architects submitted designs. The final winning drawings were finished in 1914. Then the First World War started two blocks away, and nothing was ever built.

This is the story, as reconstructed by the Sarajevo architectural historian Nedžad Kurto from Vienna archive materials at HHStA and the Sarajevo Historical Archive.

Why the Habsburgs wanted a Parliament for Bosnia

After the 1908 annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina — the moment the Habsburgs upgraded their occupation into a formal territorial claim, described in more detail in our Kállay-era piece — the Vienna administration needed to give the province a political apparatus.

The answer was a Sabor, a provincial parliament. It first met in 1910, in temporary quarters. It was, by design, a limited institution — the franchise was narrow, the powers were constrained, and Vienna reserved most of the important levers for itself — but it was a proper parliament, with 92 elected deputies from the three main religious communities, an opposition, and formal legislative procedure.

A proper parliament needed a proper building. In 1912, four years after the annexation, the Habsburg Common Ministry of Finance (which administered Bosnia) opened an international architectural competition for a permanent Sabor palace. The chosen site was the south bank of the Miljacka, directly opposite Vijećnica.

The message that would have sent was clear: Sarajevo would have two matching civic buildings across the river — city hall and provincial parliament, both in the Habsburg-Bosnia idiom, both facing each other, both monumental. The programme was Vienna’s version of “we are here to stay.”

The competition

The 1912 competition drew sixteen submissions from architects across the Monarchy. Kurto’s paper works through the list.

Second prize was awarded to Rudolf Tönnies — the German-born, Vienna-trained architect who was already responsible for one of the most-cited Marijin Dvor Habsburg buildings in Sarajevo, the Salomova palata with its hidden 1912 atrium. Tönnies had the advantage of already knowing the city. His Sabor design carried the neo-classical monumentality he was working in that year.

Third prize, also Tönnies. He submitted two entries, both placed.

A special-mention prize went to Anton Floderer in Vienna, who submitted under the motto “Am Balkan” — a rhetorical framing that told you exactly how the Vienna-based competitors were thinking about the site.

First prize was withheld. None of the sixteen submissions was, in the jury’s judgement, the definitive answer. This was, in Habsburg competition practice, a common way of preserving the administration’s discretion on the eventual choice: you awarded a set of prizes, you thanked everyone, and then you commissioned who you actually wanted.

In this case, the eventual commission went to Josip Vancaš — the Vienna-trained Slovenian architect who by 1912 had already given Sarajevo the Sacred Heart Cathedral (1889), the Marienhof apartment palace, the Main Post Office (1913), and roughly 250 other Habsburg-era Sarajevo buildings. Vancaš had, by 1914, evolved from his early Neo-Gothic sacral vocabulary through Historicism into full Vienna Secession.

He drew the final Sabor design in 1914. Kurto describes it as a monumental Secessionist parliament palace with a symmetrical facade on the Miljacka, a central portico, and a domed central chamber. Two wings for the two elected chambers.

Why the building didn’t happen

Vancaš finished the working drawings in the spring of 1914. Construction was budgeted, the site cleared, the building schedule agreed with the Cantonal administration.

On 28 June 1914, an eighteen-year-old Bosnian Serb student called Gavrilo Princip fired two shots at Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife Sophie two blocks west of the Sabor site, on the corner of what is now Zelenih Beretki and Obala Kulina Bana. Both died within the hour.

Within weeks, Europe was at war. Within four years, the Habsburg empire ceased to exist. The Sabor palace project — funded, designed, ready to break ground — was suspended, and never resumed.

The piece of land where it was to have stood remained an empty site through the interwar period. Various parts of the plot were later built on with smaller structures. You can still stand where it was supposed to be. There is no plaque.

What Sarajevo would have looked like if it had been built

Two monumental Habsburg civic buildings facing each other across the Miljacka would have changed the reading of the city. Vijećnica alone is the token of the Habsburg attempt to build a legitimate administrative civilisation. Two buildings facing each other — city hall and parliament, Wittek-Pařík-Iveković and Vancaš — would have made the claim harder to ignore: that Sarajevo was intended to be a proper capital of a proper administrative unit, not a garrison town.

The war stopped that. And after the war, when the new Yugoslav state took over, the idea of a Sarajevo Sabor palace was no longer politically useful. The site sat empty.

You could argue, and the site’s editor sometimes does over coffee, that the reason Sarajevo has always been read as “a city on the edge” rather than “a capital” is partly because the Habsburgs never got the second big building up. Vijećnica by itself is a beautiful anomaly. Two Habsburg civic monuments facing each other on the same river would have made a claim about the city’s status that is now impossible to make in the physical fabric.

What to do with this

Walk from the Latin Bridge three minutes east along the south embankment of the Miljacka. Stop opposite Vijećnica. Look north across the river at the striped Habsburg-Moorish city hall. Look back south at what you’re standing on — a small park and some paving.

The Sabor was supposed to be here. Vancaš finished the drawings weeks before Princip fired his shots. The First World War stopped it. The building never got built.

You are standing in one of Sarajevo’s most missing places — an empty space where a whole 1914 alternative history of the city was supposed to live.

If Kurto’s paper is the only place this is recorded in detail, then let’s put it here too. A parliament palace. Vancaš. 1914. Never happened. Now you know.

Sources & further reading

Keep reading

More from the guide.